Fetching financial data...

360investing

★ Watchlist

Lucid Group, Inc.

NASDAQ · Consumer Cyclical
Lucid Group, Inc.
LCID · Auto Manufacturers
$6.68
▲ 0.14 (2.14%)
Data cached · refreshes every 10 min
Insufficient data to generate a complete Graham analysis.
Overall Grade
F
Defensive
F
Enterprising
Profitability F
Gross Profit Margin -92.8%
Operating Margin -258.7%
Net Income Margin -199.3%
Fin. Health D
Years to Pay Off Debt -1.2 yrs
Working Capital vs Long-Term Debt -$1.4B
Working Capital $664M
Valuation F
Price-to-Book 3.41x
Cash Flow F
Free Cash Flow -$3.8B
Owner Earnings -$1.4B
0/6
Graham Score
Speculative
Defensive — Graham's strict criteria (P/B, P/E, dividends, stability)  ·  Enterprising — Profitability & cash flow focused, accepts higher valuations for quality
Metric Explanations
What each dimension measures and where the thresholds come from.
Gross Profit Margin
Revenue minus cost of goods sold. Graham's ≥40% threshold identifies businesses with durable pricing power. Note: software and financial companies naturally exceed this; retailers and manufacturers rarely reach it due to their cost structures.
Operating Margin
Profit after operating costs before interest and taxes. A consistent ≥15% operating margin signals a business with real competitive advantages. Capital-intensive industries (airlines, auto, commodities) rarely hit this threshold due to their structural cost base — compare within industry for context.
Net Income Margin
Bottom-line profit as a percentage of revenue. The ≥20% target reflects Buffett's preference for highly profitable businesses. Financial engineering (buybacks, tax optimisation) can inflate this temporarily — look for consistency across multiple years rather than a single strong result.
Years to Pay Off Debt
Total Debt ÷ Net Income. Lower = stronger balance sheet. Important caveat: utilities, telecoms, REITs, and infrastructure companies carry large structural debt by design — their bond-like cash flows service it comfortably at ratios that would alarm Graham. Compare within sector.
Working Capital vs Long-Term Debt
Working Capital minus Long-Term Debt. Negative results are common and expected in capital-return-focused businesses like Apple, Domino's, and McDonald's — where aggressive buybacks and dividends intentionally reduce book equity. This does not indicate financial distress in high-FCF businesses.
Working Capital
Current Assets minus Current Liabilities. Negative working capital can be a deliberate efficiency strategy in businesses that collect cash before paying suppliers (retailers, fast food franchises, subscription businesses). Assess alongside free cash flow generation for full context.
Price-to-Book
Market price vs book value per share. Rarely below 1.5x for quality businesses today. Intangible assets (brand, software, patents) don't appear on the balance sheet under accounting rules, making P/B artificially high for asset-light companies. Negative P/B indicates book equity has been reduced by buybacks — common in highly profitable capital-return businesses.
Free Cash Flow
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures. Buffett's most important metric — cash a business actually generates for its owners after maintaining and growing its asset base. Consistently positive FCF is one of the strongest indicators of a durable, well-run business regardless of accounting profits.
Owner Earnings
Net Income + Depreciation & Amortisation − Capital Expenditures. Buffett's preferred measure of a company's true annual earning power — what could theoretically be distributed to owners without impairing the business. More reliable than reported EPS because it accounts for the capital cost of maintaining the business.
Market Data
Market Cap $2.4B
Enterprise Value $6.0B
P/E (TTM) -1.78
Dividend Yield N/A
Exchange NASDAQ
Key Margins
Gross Profit -92.8%
Operating Margin -258.7%
Net Margin -199.3%
Company Info
Sector Consumer Cyclical
Industry Auto Manufacturers
Employees 9000
Country United States
Visit website
About Lucid Group, Inc.

Lucid Group, Inc., a technology company, designs, develops, manufactures, and sells electric vehicles (EV), EV powertrains, and battery systems. The company provides Lucid Air sedan and Lucid Gravity SUV. It also designs and develops proprietary software in-house for Lucid vehicles. The company sells vehicles directly to consumers through its retail sales network and direct online sales, including Lucid Financial Services. The company is headquartered in Newark, California. Lucid Group, Inc. is a subsidiary of Ayar Third Investment Company.

Showing Key Metrics
Income Highlights
Metric 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021
Gross Profit % -92.8% ▲ -114.3% -225.2% -170.7% N/A
Operating Margin % -258.7% ▲ -371.4% -516.6% -426.5% N/A
Net Income % -199.3% ▲ -336.0% -475.1% -214.5% N/A
Diluted EPS -12.09 ▲ -12.50 -13.60 -15.10 N/A
Balance Sheet Highlights
Metric 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021
Total Assets $8.4B $9.6B $8.5B $7.9B N/A
Total Debt $3.2B ↑ $2.5B $2.4B $2.3B N/A
Working Capital $664M ▼ $3.7B $3.7B $4.0B N/A
Years to Pay Debt -1.18 -0.91 -0.86 -1.80 N/A
Cash Flow Highlights
Metric 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021
Free Cash Flow -$3.8B ▼ -$2.9B -$3.4B -$3.3B N/A
Owner Earnings -$1.4B -$1.5B -$1.7B -$43M N/A
CapEx % of Net Income N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
These metrics estimate what Lucid Group, Inc. is worth based on its fundamentals — independent of what the market currently prices it at. Graham's Fair Value and NCAV are conservative floors rooted in 1930s–60s principles. EPV assumes zero growth. None are price targets — they are reference points for judging whether the current price offers a margin of safety.
Graham's Fair Value
N/A (negative EPS)
Margin of Safety
—
Market Cap ÷ Company Value
3.85
P/B Ratio
3.41
Warren's Owner Earnings
-$1.4B
Latest fiscal year
Graham's 7 Criteria
Defensive Investor Checklist
0/6 — Speculative Investor
❌ Adequate Size
$1.4B
vs > $1.5B revenue
❌ Strong Financial Condition
1.25x
vs Current Ratio > 2.0x
❌ Earnings Stability
4 loss years (4 yrs data)
vs No negative EPS years
❌ Dividend Record
No dividend
vs Uninterrupted dividends
❌ Moderate P/E Ratio
-1.8x
vs P/E ≤ 15.0x
❌ Moderate Price-to-Book
3.41x P/B (P/E×P/B: -6.1)
vs P/B ≤ 1.5x | P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5
Graham's 7 Criteria — Explained
What each criterion measures and why it may or may not apply to modern businesses.
❌ Adequate Size — $1.4B vs > $1.5B revenue
Graham required companies large enough to withstand economic downturns. This threshold ($1.5B) is inflation-adjusted from Graham's original $100M — virtually all S&P 500 companies pass this today.
"The minimum size of an enterprise should be not less than $100 million of annual sales."
❌ Strong Financial Condition — 1.25x vs Current Ratio > 2.0x
Current assets must be at least twice current liabilities. Note: highly profitable companies (Apple, Domino's) often run negative or low working capital deliberately — they collect cash fast and stretch payables. A failing score here is not always a warning sign.
"For industrial companies, current assets should be at least twice current liabilities."
❌ Earnings Stability — 4 loss years (4 yrs data) vs No negative EPS years
Graham required uninterrupted positive earnings. Any loss year is a red flag for defensive investors. Growth companies and cyclicals may show occasional losses during investment cycles or downturns without being fundamentally unsound.
"The company should have shown no deficit in the past ten years."
❌ Dividend Record — No dividend vs Uninterrupted dividends
Graham valued dividends as evidence of financial discipline and shareholder alignment. Many excellent modern businesses (Alphabet, Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway) pay no dividend, preferring to reinvest cash at high rates of return. Failing this criterion does not indicate a poor business — it may indicate a high-growth one.
"Some current dividend payments — for at least the past 20 years."
❌ Moderate P/E Ratio — -1.8x vs P/E ≤ 15.0x
Graham's 15x P/E threshold was calibrated to 1960s market averages when interest rates were higher. Today's lower rate environment structurally supports higher multiples — the S&P 500 long-run average P/E is now closer to 20–25x. A stock trading at 20x is not automatically speculative in the modern context.
"The price-earnings ratio should be no more than 15 times average earnings."
❌ Moderate Price-to-Book — 3.41x P/B (P/E×P/B: -6.1) vs P/B ≤ 1.5x | P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5
Graham's 1.5x P/B threshold made sense when most company value was tangible. Today, intangible assets — brand, software, patents, network effects — rarely appear on the balance sheet. A high P/B in tech, pharma, or consumer brands often reflects intangible value, not overvaluation. P/FCF or EV/EBITDA are more reliable for asset-light businesses.
"The price should not be more than 1½ times book value. P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5."
Net Current Asset Value
$-11.93
Negative NCAV — liabilities exceed current assets. Common in capital-return businesses (buybacks, debt-funded dividends) and capital-intensive industries. Not automatically a warning sign.
"Buy at two-thirds of net current assets." — Graham
Earnings Power Value
$-106.25
Per share, no-growth floor. Compare to current price.
Cash Flow Analysis
Metric 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021
Capital Expenditure % of Net Income N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Repurchase of Capital Stock N/A N/A $0M -$219M -$24M
Free Cash Flow -$3.8B ▼ -$2.9B ▲ -$3.4B ▼ -$3.3B • N/A •
Warren's Owner Earnings -$1.4B -$1.5B -$1.7B -$43M N/A
Peers & Industry Comparison
Auto Manufacturers — Auto-detected peers
Company Price Market Cap P/E Gross Margin Net Margin Revenue
LCID $6.68 $2.4B -1.78 -92.8% -199.3% $1.4B
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.		 $392.81 $1,475.3B 360.4 19.1% 3.9% $97.9B
F
Ford Motor Company		 $11.53 $46.2B N/A 7.1% -3.2% $189.9B
GM
General Motors Company		 $75.73 $68.3B 27.6 11.1% 1.4% $184.6B
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation		 $188.35 $223.0B 10.6 17.6% 7.3% $50,450.8B
STLA
Stellantis N.V.		 $7.11 $20.6B N/A 5.8% -13.9% $155.8B
"The management of a business is its most important single factor — more important than market position, patents, or financial structure."
— Benjamin Graham
Capital Allocation & Alignment
Insider Ownership
12.17%
High — management has strong skin in the game
Return on Equity (ROE)
-376.1%
Weak — poor returns on equity
Return on Assets (ROA)
-32.2%
Poor — assets are not generating adequate returns
Debt Trend YoY
+29.1% YoY
Debt is growing — management is leveraging up
Leadership Team
Marc Winterhoff
Interim Chief Executive Officer
Age 56
Pay: $1,988,294
Taoufiq Boussaid
Chief Financial Officer
Age 54
Pay: $4,135,918
Adrian Price
Senior Vice President of Operations
Nick Twork
Vice President of Communications
Akerho Oghoghomeh
Senior Vice President of Marketing
Age 44
Top Institutional Holders
Institution % Owned Shares
Public Investment Fund 53.64% 177,088,867
Uber Technologies, Inc 4.15% 13,715,121
Vanguard Group Inc 3.65% 12,061,286
UBS Group AG 2.33% 7,677,272
Blackrock Inc. 1.83% 6,057,353
Morgan Stanley 1.36% 4,487,208
Marshall Wace LLP 0.82% 2,716,140
Geode Capital Management, LLC 0.77% 2,541,494
⚠️ Short interest exceeds 20% — heavy bearish bets
Risk Analysis
Beta (Market Risk)
0.88
Low volatility — more stable than the market
Short Interest
29.4% of float
Heavy short selling — market has significant bearish bets
Debt-to-Equity
1.07x
Moderate leverage
Current Ratio
1.25x
Adequate liquidity
52-Week Price Range
Low: $5.62 Current: $6.68 High: $33.70
Currently at 4% of 52-week range

Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) fundamental analysis — Overall grade F based on profitability, financial health, valuation and cash flow. Graham's Fair Value: N/A (negative EPS). Gross profit margin: -92.8%. Operating margin: -258.7%. Net margin: -199.3%. Market cap: $2.4B. Sector: Consumer Cyclical. Industry: Auto Manufacturers. Analysis powered by 360investing — free fundamental stock analysis based on Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffett principles.

Disclaimer: 360investing is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. All data is sourced from public third-party providers and may be delayed, inaccurate, or incomplete. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Analysis, scores, and valuations are algorithmic and do not represent professional investment recommendations. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decision. Use of this tool constitutes acceptance that 360investing and its operators bear no liability for decisions made based on information presented here.

Data Sources & Methodology Privacy Policy