Fetching financial data...

360investing

★ Watchlist

Veeva Systems Inc.

NYSE · Healthcare
Veeva Systems Inc.
VEEV · Health Information Services
$170.22
▼ -1.38 (-0.8%)
Data cached · refreshes every 10 min
Mr. Market is currently offering Veeva Systems Inc. at $170.22.
The business passes 4 of 7 of Graham's defensive criteria — adequate but not exceptional.
Overall Grade
B
Defensive
A
Enterprising
Profitability A
Gross Profit Margin 75.5%
Operating Margin 28.7%
Net Income Margin 28.4%
Fin. Health A
Years to Pay Off Debt 0.1 yrs
Working Capital vs Long-Term Debt $6.3B
Working Capital $6.4B
Valuation F
Margin of Safety 0.0%
Price-to-Book 3.85x
Cash Flow A
Free Cash Flow $1.4B
4/7
Graham Score
Enterprising
Defensive — Graham's strict criteria (P/B, P/E, dividends, stability)  ·  Enterprising — Profitability & cash flow focused, accepts higher valuations for quality
Metric Explanations
What each dimension measures and where the thresholds come from.
Gross Profit Margin
Revenue minus cost of goods sold. Graham's ≥40% threshold identifies businesses with durable pricing power. Note: software and financial companies naturally exceed this; retailers and manufacturers rarely reach it due to their cost structures.
Operating Margin
Profit after operating costs before interest and taxes. A consistent ≥15% operating margin signals a business with real competitive advantages. Capital-intensive industries (airlines, auto, commodities) rarely hit this threshold due to their structural cost base — compare within industry for context.
Net Income Margin
Bottom-line profit as a percentage of revenue. The ≥20% target reflects Buffett's preference for highly profitable businesses. Financial engineering (buybacks, tax optimisation) can inflate this temporarily — look for consistency across multiple years rather than a single strong result.
Years to Pay Off Debt
Total Debt ÷ Net Income. Lower = stronger balance sheet. Important caveat: utilities, telecoms, REITs, and infrastructure companies carry large structural debt by design — their bond-like cash flows service it comfortably at ratios that would alarm Graham. Compare within sector.
Working Capital vs Long-Term Debt
Working Capital minus Long-Term Debt. Negative results are common and expected in capital-return-focused businesses like Apple, Domino's, and McDonald's — where aggressive buybacks and dividends intentionally reduce book equity. This does not indicate financial distress in high-FCF businesses.
Working Capital
Current Assets minus Current Liabilities. Negative working capital can be a deliberate efficiency strategy in businesses that collect cash before paying suppliers (retailers, fast food franchises, subscription businesses). Assess alongside free cash flow generation for full context.
Margin of Safety
How far below the Graham Number the stock trades. Graham required a 33% discount as a buffer against analytical error. However, the Graham Number itself assumes 1960s-era P/E and P/B norms — for modern asset-light businesses it often understates true intrinsic value, making 0% MoS appear misleadingly bad.
Price-to-Book
Market price vs book value per share. Rarely below 1.5x for quality businesses today. Intangible assets (brand, software, patents) don't appear on the balance sheet under accounting rules, making P/B artificially high for asset-light companies. Negative P/B indicates book equity has been reduced by buybacks — common in highly profitable capital-return businesses.
Free Cash Flow
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures. Buffett's most important metric — cash a business actually generates for its owners after maintaining and growing its asset base. Consistently positive FCF is one of the strongest indicators of a durable, well-run business regardless of accounting profits.
Market Cap $28.0B
Enterprise Value $21.6B
P/E (TTM) 31.29
Dividend Yield N/A
Exchange NYSE
Gross Profit 75.5%
Operating Margin 28.7%
Net Margin 28.4%
Sector Healthcare
Industry Health Information Services
Employees 7928
Country United States
📖
Full Graham Analysis

Mr. Market is currently offering Veeva Systems Inc. at $170.22.

The business passes 4 of 7 of Graham's defensive criteria — adequate but not exceptional.

At $170.22, the stock trades at a 131% premium to its Graham Number of $73.53. Graham would consider this price speculative.

There is no margin of safety at the current price. Graham would advise patience and waiting for a better entry point.

Trading at 4.5x NCAV. Expected for most quality businesses — NCAV was designed to find depression-era bargains and rarely applies to modern profitable companies..

Conclusion: This stock is better suited for Graham's Enterprising investor — one willing to devote time and skill to security selection.

About Veeva Systems Inc.

Veeva Systems Inc. provides cloud-based software for the life sciences industry in North America, Europe, the Asia Pacific, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America. The company offers Veeva Commercial Cloud comprising Veeva Vault CRM Suite for pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies; Veeva Medical that provides source of medical content across multiple channels and geographies; Veeva PromoMats, an end-to-end content and digital asset management solution; and Veeva Crossix, an analytics platform for pharmaceutical brands. It also provides Veeva Data Cloud, such as Veeva OpenData, a customer reference data solution; Veeva Link, which provides deep data; Veeva Compass, which includes de-identified and longitudinal patient data; and Veeva CRM Pulse that provides access and multichannel engagement metrics. In addition, the company offers Veeva Development Cloud consisting of Veeva Clinical Platform, which advances clinical trial execution; Veeva Clinical Data Management that helps sponsors and CROs design and run trials; Veeva Safety, which unifies systems and processes; Veeva RIM that provides regulatory information management capabilities, as well as Veeva Quality Cloud, which is used by the life sciences and consumer products industries; and Veeva Business Consulting services. Further, it provides professional and support services, including implementation and deployment planning, and project management; requirements analysis, solution design, and configuration; systems environment management and deployment; services focused on advancing or transforming business and operating processes; technical consulting services on data migration and systems integrations; training; and ongoing managed services, such as outsourced systems administration. The company was formerly known as Verticals onDemand, Inc. and changed its name to Veeva Systems Inc. in April 2009. Veeva Systems Inc. was incorporated in 2007 and is headquartered in Pleasanton, California.

Showing Key Metrics
Income Highlights
Metric 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022
Gross Profit % 75.5% 74.5% 71.3% 71.7% N/A
Operating Margin % 28.7% 25.2% 18.2% 21.3% N/A
Net Income % 28.4% 26.0% 22.2% 22.6% N/A
Diluted EPS 5.44 4.32 3.22 3.00 N/A
Balance Sheet Highlights
Metric 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022
Total Assets $9.0B $7.3B $5.9B $4.8B N/A
Total Debt $96M $76M $56M $61M N/A
Working Capital $6.4B $4.9B $3.8B $3.0B N/A
Years to Pay Debt 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.13 N/A
Cash Flow Highlights
Metric 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022
Free Cash Flow $1.4B $1.1B $911M $780M N/A
Owner Earnings N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
CapEx % of Net Income N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
These metrics estimate what Veeva Systems Inc. is worth based on its fundamentals — independent of what the market currently prices it at. Graham's Fair Value and NCAV are conservative floors rooted in 1930s–60s principles. EPV assumes zero growth. None are price targets — they are reference points for judging whether the current price offers a margin of safety.
Graham's Fair Value
$73.53
Margin of Safety
0%
Market Cap ÷ Company Value
1.00

P/B Ratio
3.85
Warren's Owner Earnings
N/A
Latest fiscal year
Graham's 7 Criteria
Defensive Investor Checklist
4/7 — Enterprising Investor
Adequate Size
$3.2B
vs > $1.5B revenue
Strong Financial Condition
4.89x
vs Current Ratio > 2.0x
Earnings Stability
No loss years (4 yrs data)
vs No negative EPS years
Dividend Record
No dividend
vs Uninterrupted dividends
Earnings Growth
+81.3% EPS growth
vs > 33% EPS growth
Moderate P/E Ratio
31.3x
vs P/E ≤ 15.0x
Moderate Price-to-Book
3.85x P/B (P/E×P/B: 120.6)
vs P/B ≤ 1.5x | P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5
Graham's 7 Criteria — Explained
What each criterion measures and why it may or may not apply to modern businesses.
✅ Adequate Size — $3.2B vs > $1.5B revenue
Graham required companies large enough to withstand economic downturns. This threshold ($1.5B) is inflation-adjusted from Graham's original $100M — virtually all S&P 500 companies pass this today.
"The minimum size of an enterprise should be not less than $100 million of annual sales."
✅ Strong Financial Condition — 4.89x vs Current Ratio > 2.0x
Current assets must be at least twice current liabilities. Note: highly profitable companies (Apple, Domino's) often run negative or low working capital deliberately — they collect cash fast and stretch payables. A failing score here is not always a warning sign.
"For industrial companies, current assets should be at least twice current liabilities."
✅ Earnings Stability — No loss years (4 yrs data) vs No negative EPS years
Graham required uninterrupted positive earnings. Any loss year is a red flag for defensive investors. Growth companies and cyclicals may show occasional losses during investment cycles or downturns without being fundamentally unsound.
"The company should have shown no deficit in the past ten years."
❌ Dividend Record — No dividend vs Uninterrupted dividends
Graham valued dividends as evidence of financial discipline and shareholder alignment. Many excellent modern businesses (Alphabet, Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway) pay no dividend, preferring to reinvest cash at high rates of return. Failing this criterion does not indicate a poor business — it may indicate a high-growth one.
"Some current dividend payments — for at least the past 20 years."
✅ Earnings Growth — +81.3% EPS growth vs > 33% EPS growth
EPS grew from $3.00 to $5.44 over 3 years. Graham's 33% threshold was set over a 10-year period. Measured over fewer years (as here), the bar is proportionally lower. Share buybacks can also inflate EPS growth without reflecting underlying business improvement.
"A minimum increase of at least one-third in per-share earnings over ten years."
❌ Moderate P/E Ratio — 31.3x vs P/E ≤ 15.0x
Graham's 15x P/E threshold was calibrated to 1960s market averages when interest rates were higher. Today's lower rate environment structurally supports higher multiples — the S&P 500 long-run average P/E is now closer to 20–25x. A stock trading at 20x is not automatically speculative in the modern context.
"The price-earnings ratio should be no more than 15 times average earnings."
❌ Moderate Price-to-Book — 3.85x P/B (P/E×P/B: 120.6) vs P/B ≤ 1.5x | P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5
Graham's 1.5x P/B threshold made sense when most company value was tangible. Today, intangible assets — brand, software, patents, network effects — rarely appear on the balance sheet. A high P/B in tech, pharma, or consumer brands often reflects intangible value, not overvaluation. P/FCF or EV/EBITDA are more reliable for asset-light businesses.
"The price should not be more than 1½ times book value. P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5."
Net Current Asset Value
$38.16
Trading at 4.5x NCAV. Expected for most quality businesses — NCAV was designed to find depression-era bargains and rarely applies to modern profitable companies.
"Buy at two-thirds of net current assets." — Graham
Earnings Power Value
$62.34
Per share, no-growth floor. Compare to current price.
Cash Flow Analysis
Metric 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022
Capital Expenditure % of Net Income N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Repurchase of Capital Stock -$170M $0M $0M N/A N/A
Free Cash Flow $1.4B $1.1B $911M $780M N/A
Warren's Owner Earnings N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Peers & Industry
No auto-detected peers for Health Information Services. You can manually compare VEEV against any stock using the Compare tool.
"The management of a business is its most important single factor — more important than market position, patents, or financial structure."
— Benjamin Graham
Capital Allocation & Alignment
Insider Ownership
8.57%
Moderate — some alignment with shareholders
Return on Equity (ROE)
12.6%
Adequate — returns are moderate
Return on Assets (ROA)
10.1%
Strong — management uses assets efficiently
Share Buybacks (Latest Year)
$170M
Management is returning capital to shareholders via buybacks
Debt Trend YoY
+26.5% YoY
Debt is growing — management is leveraging up
Leadership Team
Peter Gassner
Founder, CEO & Director
Age 60
Pay: $445,833
0.049% of net income
Eleni Nitsa Zuppas
President & Chief of Staff
Age 55
Pay: $445,833
0.049% of net income
Thomas Schwenger
President & Chief Customer Officer
Age 57
Pay: $445,833
0.049% of net income
Brian Van Wagener
Chief Financial Officer
Age 42
Pay: $530,975
0.058% of net income
Paul Shawah
Executive Vice President of Strategy & Campaign Manager
Top Institutional Holders
Institution % Owned Shares
Vanguard Group Inc 9.41% 15,368,868
Blackrock Inc. 7.01% 11,445,585
Alliancebernstein L.P. 3.58% 5,844,608
FMR, LLC 3.37% 5,510,551
Principal Financial Group, Inc. 2.37% 3,870,293
State Street Corporation 2.20% 3,589,425
T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. 2.20% 3,585,205
Geode Capital Management, LLC 1.94% 3,172,716
Risk Analysis
Beta (Market Risk)
0.92
Low volatility — more stable than the market
Short Interest
3.9% of float
Low short interest — market is not heavily bearish
Debt-to-Equity
0.01x
Conservative balance sheet — low financial risk
Current Ratio
4.88x
Strong liquidity — Graham approved
52-Week Price Range
Low: $148.05 Current: $170.22 High: $310.50
Currently at 14% of 52-week range

Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) fundamental analysis — Overall grade B based on profitability, financial health, valuation and cash flow. Graham's Fair Value: $73.53. Margin of safety: 0%. Gross profit margin: 75.5%. Operating margin: 28.7%. Net margin: 28.4%. Market cap: $28.0B. Sector: Healthcare. Industry: Health Information Services. Analysis powered by 360investing — free fundamental stock analysis based on Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffett principles.

Disclaimer: 360investing is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. All data is sourced from public third-party providers and may be delayed, inaccurate, or incomplete. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Analysis, scores, and valuations are algorithmic and do not represent professional investment recommendations. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decision. Use of this tool constitutes acceptance that 360investing and its operators bear no liability for decisions made based on information presented here.

Data Sources & Methodology Privacy Policy