Fetching financial data...

360investing

★ Watchlist

Duke Energy Corporation

NYSE · Utilities
Duke Energy Corporation
DUK · Utilities - Regulated Electric
$127.43
▼ -1.17 (-0.91%)
Data cached · refreshes every 10 min
Mr. Market is currently offering Duke Energy Corporation at $127.43.
The business passes 4 of 7 of Graham's defensive criteria — adequate but not exceptional.
Overall Grade
D
Defensive
D
Enterprising
Profitability A
Gross Profit Margin 51.2%
Operating Margin 26.6%
Net Income Margin 15.4%
Fin. Health F
Years to Pay Off Debt 18.3 yrs
Working Capital vs Long-Term Debt -$89.5B
Working Capital -$9.4B
Valuation F
Margin of Safety 0.0%
Price-to-Book 1.95x
Cash Flow F
Free Cash Flow -$1.7B
CapEx % of Net Income 282.3%
Owner Earnings $26.7B
4/7
Graham Score
Enterprising
Defensive — Graham's strict criteria (P/B, P/E, dividends, stability)  ·  Enterprising — Profitability & cash flow focused, accepts higher valuations for quality
Metric Explanations
What each dimension measures and where the thresholds come from.
Gross Profit Margin
Revenue minus cost of goods sold. Graham's ≥40% threshold identifies businesses with durable pricing power. Note: software and financial companies naturally exceed this; retailers and manufacturers rarely reach it due to their cost structures.
Operating Margin
Profit after operating costs before interest and taxes. A consistent ≥15% operating margin signals a business with real competitive advantages. Capital-intensive industries (airlines, auto, commodities) rarely hit this threshold due to their structural cost base — compare within industry for context.
Net Income Margin
Bottom-line profit as a percentage of revenue. The ≥20% target reflects Buffett's preference for highly profitable businesses. Financial engineering (buybacks, tax optimisation) can inflate this temporarily — look for consistency across multiple years rather than a single strong result.
Years to Pay Off Debt
Total Debt ÷ Net Income. Lower = stronger balance sheet. Important caveat: utilities, telecoms, REITs, and infrastructure companies carry large structural debt by design — their bond-like cash flows service it comfortably at ratios that would alarm Graham. Compare within sector.
Working Capital vs Long-Term Debt
Working Capital minus Long-Term Debt. Negative results are common and expected in capital-return-focused businesses like Apple, Domino's, and McDonald's — where aggressive buybacks and dividends intentionally reduce book equity. This does not indicate financial distress in high-FCF businesses.
Working Capital
Current Assets minus Current Liabilities. Negative working capital can be a deliberate efficiency strategy in businesses that collect cash before paying suppliers (retailers, fast food franchises, subscription businesses). Assess alongside free cash flow generation for full context.
Margin of Safety
How far below the Graham Number the stock trades. Graham required a 33% discount as a buffer against analytical error. However, the Graham Number itself assumes 1960s-era P/E and P/B norms — for modern asset-light businesses it often understates true intrinsic value, making 0% MoS appear misleadingly bad.
Price-to-Book
Market price vs book value per share. Rarely below 1.5x for quality businesses today. Intangible assets (brand, software, patents) don't appear on the balance sheet under accounting rules, making P/B artificially high for asset-light companies. Negative P/B indicates book equity has been reduced by buybacks — common in highly profitable capital-return businesses.
Free Cash Flow
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures. Buffett's most important metric — cash a business actually generates for its owners after maintaining and growing its asset base. Consistently positive FCF is one of the strongest indicators of a durable, well-run business regardless of accounting profits.
CapEx % of Net Income
Capital expenditure as a share of net income. Low CapEx signals a capital-light business that doesn't need heavy reinvestment to sustain earnings — Buffett's ideal. High CapEx is structurally necessary in manufacturing, airlines, telecoms, and semiconductors. For these industries, a high reading reflects the business model, not poor management.
Owner Earnings
Net Income + Depreciation & Amortisation − Capital Expenditures. Buffett's preferred measure of a company's true annual earning power — what could theoretically be distributed to owners without impairing the business. More reliable than reported EPS because it accounts for the capital cost of maintaining the business.
Market Cap $99.2B
Enterprise Value $193.0B
P/E (TTM) 20.19
Dividend Yield 3.28%
Exchange NYSE
Gross Profit 51.2%
Operating Margin 26.6%
Net Margin 15.4%
Sector Utilities
Industry Utilities - Regulated Electric
Employees 26441
Country United States
📖
Full Graham Analysis

Mr. Market is currently offering Duke Energy Corporation at $127.43.

The business passes 4 of 7 of Graham's defensive criteria — adequate but not exceptional.

At $127.43, the stock trades at a 32% premium to its Graham Number of $96.33. Graham would consider this price speculative.

There is no margin of safety at the current price. Graham would advise patience and waiting for a better entry point.

Negative NCAV — liabilities exceed current assets. Common in capital-return businesses (buybacks, debt-funded dividends) and capital-intensive industries. Not automatically a warning sign..

Conclusion: This stock is better suited for Graham's Enterprising investor — one willing to devote time and skill to security selection.

About Duke Energy Corporation

Duke Energy Corporation, through its subsidiaries, operates as an energy company in the United States. The company operates through two segments: Electric Utilities and Infrastructure (EU&I); and Gas Utilities and Infrastructure (GU&I). The EU&I segment generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electricity to customers in the Southeast and Midwest regions. It generates electricity through coal, hydroelectric, natural gas, oil, renewables, and nuclear fuel. This segment also engages in the wholesale of electricity to municipalities, electric cooperative utilities, and other load-serving entities. The GU&I segment distributes natural gas to customers in the residential, commercial, industrial, and power generation natural gas sectors; and invests in pipeline transmission projects, renewable natural gas projects, and natural gas storage facilities. The company was formerly known as Duke Energy Holding Corp. and changed its name to Duke Energy Corporation in April 2006. Duke Energy Corporation was founded in 1904 and is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Showing Key Metrics
Income Highlights
Metric 2025 2024 2023 2022
Gross Profit % 51.2% 50.1% 47.3% 45.1%
Operating Margin % 26.6% 26.1% 24.4% 22.3%
Net Income % 15.4% 14.9% 9.8% 8.9%
Diluted EPS 6.31 5.71 3.54 3.33
Balance Sheet Highlights
Metric 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021
Total Assets $195.7B $186.3B $176.9B $178.1B N/A
Total Debt $90.9B $85.2B $80.5B $74.6B N/A
Working Capital -$9.4B -$6.4B -$4.5B -$5.7B N/A
Years to Pay Debt 18.29 18.84 28.32 29.25 N/A
Cash Flow Highlights
Metric 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021
Free Cash Flow -$1.7B $48M -$2.7B -$5.4B N/A
Owner Earnings $26.7B $23.2B $21.5B $19.8B N/A
CapEx % of Net Income 282.3% 271.4% 443.6% 445.8% N/A
These metrics estimate what Duke Energy Corporation is worth based on its fundamentals — independent of what the market currently prices it at. Graham's Fair Value and NCAV are conservative floors rooted in 1930s–60s principles. EPV assumes zero growth. None are price targets — they are reference points for judging whether the current price offers a margin of safety.
Graham's Fair Value
$96.33
Margin of Safety
0%
Market Cap ÷ Company Value
2.49

P/B Ratio
1.95
Warren's Owner Earnings
$26.7B
Latest fiscal year
Graham's 7 Criteria
Defensive Investor Checklist
4/7 — Enterprising Investor
Adequate Size
$32.2B
vs > $1.5B revenue
Strong Financial Condition
0.55x
vs Current Ratio > 2.0x
Earnings Stability
No loss years (4 yrs data)
vs No negative EPS years
Dividend Record
3.28%
vs Uninterrupted dividends
Earnings Growth
+89.5% EPS growth
vs > 33% EPS growth
Moderate P/E Ratio
20.2x
vs P/E ≤ 15.0x
Moderate Price-to-Book
1.95x P/B (P/E×P/B: 39.4)
vs P/B ≤ 1.5x | P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5
Graham's 7 Criteria — Explained
What each criterion measures and why it may or may not apply to modern businesses.
✅ Adequate Size — $32.2B vs > $1.5B revenue
Graham required companies large enough to withstand economic downturns. This threshold ($1.5B) is inflation-adjusted from Graham's original $100M — virtually all S&P 500 companies pass this today.
"The minimum size of an enterprise should be not less than $100 million of annual sales."
❌ Strong Financial Condition — 0.55x vs Current Ratio > 2.0x
Current assets must be at least twice current liabilities. Note: highly profitable companies (Apple, Domino's) often run negative or low working capital deliberately — they collect cash fast and stretch payables. A failing score here is not always a warning sign.
"For industrial companies, current assets should be at least twice current liabilities."
✅ Earnings Stability — No loss years (4 yrs data) vs No negative EPS years
Graham required uninterrupted positive earnings. Any loss year is a red flag for defensive investors. Growth companies and cyclicals may show occasional losses during investment cycles or downturns without being fundamentally unsound.
"The company should have shown no deficit in the past ten years."
✅ Dividend Record — 3.28% vs Uninterrupted dividends
Graham valued dividends as evidence of financial discipline and shareholder alignment. Many excellent modern businesses (Alphabet, Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway) pay no dividend, preferring to reinvest cash at high rates of return. Failing this criterion does not indicate a poor business — it may indicate a high-growth one.
"Some current dividend payments — for at least the past 20 years."
✅ Earnings Growth — +89.5% EPS growth vs > 33% EPS growth
EPS grew from $3.33 to $6.31 over 3 years. Graham's 33% threshold was set over a 10-year period. Measured over fewer years (as here), the bar is proportionally lower. Share buybacks can also inflate EPS growth without reflecting underlying business improvement.
"A minimum increase of at least one-third in per-share earnings over ten years."
❌ Moderate P/E Ratio — 20.2x vs P/E ≤ 15.0x
Graham's 15x P/E threshold was calibrated to 1960s market averages when interest rates were higher. Today's lower rate environment structurally supports higher multiples — the S&P 500 long-run average P/E is now closer to 20–25x. A stock trading at 20x is not automatically speculative in the modern context.
"The price-earnings ratio should be no more than 15 times average earnings."
❌ Moderate Price-to-Book — 1.95x P/B (P/E×P/B: 39.4) vs P/B ≤ 1.5x | P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5
Graham's 1.5x P/B threshold made sense when most company value was tangible. Today, intangible assets — brand, software, patents, network effects — rarely appear on the balance sheet. A high P/B in tech, pharma, or consumer brands often reflects intangible value, not overvaluation. P/FCF or EV/EBITDA are more reliable for asset-light businesses.
"The price should not be more than 1½ times book value. P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5."
Net Current Asset Value
$-168.47
Negative NCAV — liabilities exceed current assets. Common in capital-return businesses (buybacks, debt-funded dividends) and capital-intensive industries. Not automatically a warning sign.
"Buy at two-thirds of net current assets." — Graham
Earnings Power Value
$122.46
Per share, no-growth floor. Compare to current price.
Cash Flow Analysis
Metric 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021
Capital Expenditure % of Net Income 282.3% 271.4% 443.6% 445.8% N/A
Repurchase of Capital Stock $0M -$1.0B $0M $0M N/A
Free Cash Flow -$1.7B $48M -$2.7B -$5.4B N/A
Warren's Owner Earnings $26.7B $23.2B $21.5B $19.8B N/A
Peers & Industry
No auto-detected peers for Utilities - Regulated Electric. You can manually compare DUK against any stock using the Compare tool.
"The management of a business is its most important single factor — more important than market position, patents, or financial structure."
— Benjamin Graham
Capital Allocation & Alignment
Insider Ownership
0.12%
Low — management has little skin in the game
Return on Equity (ROE)
9.8%
Adequate — returns are moderate
Return on Assets (ROA)
2.5%
Fair — average asset utilization
Debt Trend YoY
+6.6% YoY
Debt is roughly stable
Leadership Team
Harry Sideris
President, CEO & Director
Age 55
Pay: $3,501,416
0.070% of net income
Brian Savoy
Executive VP & CFO
Age 50
Pay: $1,852,498
0.037% of net income
Preston Gillespie Jr.
Executive Vice President of Nuclear Program Strategy
Age 62
Pay: $1,907,964
0.038% of net income
Kodwo Ghartey-Tagoe
Executive VP, CEO of Duke Energy Carolinas & Head of the Natural Gas Business Unit
Age 62
Pay: $2,074,220
0.042% of net income
Louis Renjel
Executive VP, CEO of Duke Energy Florida & Midwest and Chief Corporate Affairs Officer
Age 51
Pay: $1,488,725
0.030% of net income
Top Institutional Holders
Institution % Owned Shares
Vanguard Group Inc 10.06% 78,258,757
Blackrock Inc. 8.85% 68,890,640
State Street Corporation 5.65% 43,953,400
Geode Capital Management, LLC 2.48% 19,292,633
Massachusetts Financial Services Co. 2.06% 16,044,472
Wellington Management Group, LLP 1.62% 12,607,783
Morgan Stanley 1.59% 12,340,630
FMR, LLC 1.53% 11,902,255
⚠️ Current ratio below 1 — liquidity risk
Risk Analysis
Beta (Market Risk)
0.40
Low volatility — more stable than the market
Short Interest
2.2% of float
Low short interest — market is not heavily bearish
Debt-to-Equity
1.72x
Moderate leverage
Current Ratio
0.55x
Weak liquidity — current liabilities exceed current assets
52-Week Price Range
Low: $111.22 Current: $127.43 High: $134.49
Currently at 70% of 52-week range

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) fundamental analysis — Overall grade D based on profitability, financial health, valuation and cash flow. Graham's Fair Value: $96.33. Margin of safety: 0%. Gross profit margin: 51.2%. Operating margin: 26.6%. Net margin: 15.4%. Market cap: $99.2B. Sector: Utilities. Industry: Utilities - Regulated Electric. Analysis powered by 360investing — free fundamental stock analysis based on Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffett principles.

Disclaimer: 360investing is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. All data is sourced from public third-party providers and may be delayed, inaccurate, or incomplete. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Analysis, scores, and valuations are algorithmic and do not represent professional investment recommendations. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decision. Use of this tool constitutes acceptance that 360investing and its operators bear no liability for decisions made based on information presented here.

Data Sources & Methodology Privacy Policy